Ads Top

"By 2022, it's not unreasonable to assume we'll have hit or are nearing 1000 Pokémon. How do you prefer to see this being handled into the future?"


1000 is pretty arbitrary for a Pokemon limit (maybe this should be dubbed Peak Pokedex?). But at the same time, the number of critters may become unmanageable for both players and developers of future games. What should be done about this? Here are some ideas but I'm curious to hear your thoughts?Cap Pokémon at 1000 and focus on gameplay changes for future gamesKeep going to infinityCap Pokémon at 1000 and cull the crappier ones to make some room. Then begin a reboot of the entire main series.Anyway, what do you think of the ever expanding number of Pokemon? Should anything be done or nothing at all? via /r/pokemon http://ift.tt/2du7QOH
"By 2022, it's not unreasonable to assume we'll have hit or are nearing 1000 Pokémon. How do you prefer to see this being handled into the future?" "By 2022, it's not unreasonable to assume we'll have hit or are nearing 1000 Pokémon. How do you prefer to see this being handled into the future?" Reviewed by The Pokémonger on 18:33 Rating: 5

No comments

Hey Everybody!

Welcome to the space of Pokémonger! We're all grateful to Pokémon & Niantic for developing Pokémon GO. This site is made up of fan posts, updates, tips and memes curated from the web! This site is not affiliated with Pokémon GO or its makers, just a fan site collecting everything a fan would like. Drop a word if you want to feature anything! Cheers.