"Trying to list every argument for Sinnoh Remakes"

In my nostalgia-fueled attempt to convince myself of Sinnoh's confirmation, I've compiled quite a list of evidence. If you believe any of these are totally invalid or if you have your own ideas, please comment below.They were technically confirmed to happen eventually as soon as ORAS was announced, since GameFreak wouldn't just stop doing remakes after already doing them three times.They would make a lot of money. I'm far from the only nostalgic Sinnoh fan.If Pokemon does make the switch to the Nintendo Switch starting with the next installment, it would continue the trend of remakes coming on a platform the original couldn't be played on.Sinnoh starters aren't in Sun and Moon, and the Sinnoh and Alola Pokedexes don't have that much overlap in general (if someone has the exact breakdown of this, that would be appreciated)Type:Null is a pretty clear reference to Arceus, and the files on its creation in the Aether labs reference the Canalave Library.SM parallels Platinum by having you follow the main villain into another dimension at the climax of the game.Since they would be the "megaverse" counterparts to the original DPPt, they would be a good place to continue the overarching multiverse plot lineThey would be a good place to resolve all or some of the mysteries surrounding Looker, since he debuted in Platinum.The 20th movie's new traveling companions have a Piplup and a Lucario; the only other non-Kanto Pokemon shown off are Ho-oh, which really doesn't count because of its role in the anime, and Marshadow and Incineroar, which market the still new-ish Gen 7.SM's breeder classes look like DPPt's Cowgirl/Rancher classes.Books in Burnet's Lab reference Palkia, Giratina, and Bronzong (RIP Dialga, lol)Solgaleo and Lunala's foreheads are blue and pink respectively, and the same color scheme is used in the Team Skull battle intro.So did I miss anything? via /r/pokemon http://ift.tt/2ocWupc